In Re Landfield
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This reciprocal disciplinary matter stems from respondent’s, Stephen Land-field’s, six-month suspension from the practice of law with a fitness requirement imposed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. 1 Respondent was cited in four separate orders for various violations of the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct (“NJRPC”), and received suspensions for periods of three to six months to run concurrently. The net sanction was a six-month suspension and included the requirement that respondent prove fitness to practice law as a condition of reinstatement.
Upon receiving notice from Bar…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re LandfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011