Legal Opinion

In Re Wortzel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1997No. 96-BG-648PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility in which it concludes that respondent’s conviction of two felony counts of child abuse, in violation of Md.Code Art. 27, § 35A, involves moral turpitude per se, thus requiring respondent’s disbarment under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a), and it appearing that respondent has taken no position, 1 and further that Bar Counsel has taken no exception to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred, effective forthwith, from the practice…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re SharpDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re RostokerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. In re Micah Jared SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API