Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy Dist. v. Peters
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
This action in equity was brought by the appellant to enjoin the appellee from irrigating land by the use of water from a well drilled by him that tapped the Roswell Artesian basin.
This is a second appeal of the case. See. the same case, 50 N.M. 165, 173 P.2d 490, 505.
It is alleged substantially by appellant that appellee drilled a well that drew water from the Roswell Artesian Basin, and with the water from such well irrigated about 28S acres of land, without any permit from the State Engineer. That there was at the time this well was completed, and at the time this suit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. MendenhallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. State Engineer v. CriderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- WS Ranch Company v. Kaiser Steel CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Kelley v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re: United States of America & State of NM v. A & R ProductionsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022