Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Carlsbad Irrigation District

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1966No. 7594PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to file second motion for rehearing is denied; however, upon consideration of the motion, the opinion heretofore filed is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Justice.

Appellants, State Engineer of New Mexico and Carlsbad Irrigation District, have appealed from the trial court’s ruling directing the State Engineer to approve the application of C. M. Kelley, appellee, to change his point of diversion from the Hondo River and to appropriate waters of the Roswell Artesian Basin. The State Engineer had previously denied appellee’s application and, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kelley v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Clodfelter v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Public Service Company v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herrington v. State Ex Rel. Office of the State EngineerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Brantley v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Reynolds v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. WS Ranch Company v. Kaiser Steel CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API