Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Mendenhall

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1961No. 6768PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

Does a landowner who lawfully initiates the development of an underground water right and carries the same to completion with reasonable diligence acquire a water right with a priority date as of the beginning of his work, notwithstanding the fact that the lands involved were put into a declared artesian basin before work was completed and the water put to beneficial use on the ground ? This is the only question presented in this appeal.

The lands owned by appellants were in close proximity to, but outside the Roswell Artesian Basin, which was declared as such by the State…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Erickson v. McLeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Reese v. DempseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State of New Mexico v. General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hanson v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API