State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Mendenhall
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
Does a landowner who lawfully initiates the development of an underground water right and carries the same to completion with reasonable diligence acquire a water right with a priority date as of the beginning of his work, notwithstanding the fact that the lands involved were put into a declared artesian basin before work was completed and the water put to beneficial use on the ground ? This is the only question presented in this appeal.
The lands owned by appellants were in close proximity to, but outside the Roswell Artesian Basin, which was declared as such by the State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Erickson v. McLeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Reese v. DempseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State of New Mexico v. General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Hanson v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.