Legal Opinion
Brice v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 6, 1996No. 95-835VPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
I
In this vaccine action, petitioners, Joseph Tilghman Brice (Tilghman) and his parents, Laurajean Councill Brice and Joseph Osier Brice, seek compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (the Vaccine Act), for injuries Tilghman allegedly suffered as a result of a Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccination administered on April 30, 1992. Petitioners contend that Tilghman suffers from a residual seizure disorder and brain damage which have impaired his speech and behavior patterns. On May 9, 1992, nine days after he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Carter v. South Central BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michael and Melissa Markovich, Parents of Ashlyn M. Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cook v. Children's Medical Group, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Goetz v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Markovich v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.