Legal Opinion

Goetz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 4, 1999No. 99-127 VPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

Petitioners, the parents and legal representatives of a child allegedly injured by a DPT vaccine, sue here to set aside a decision of the Office of Special Masters denying compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34 (1994 & Supp. I 1995))(“Vaccine Act”). Specifically, the special master found that petitioners’ claim was not filed within the three-year limitations period established by the Vaccine Act. § 300aa-16(a)(2). The special master also rejected…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
The Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

Michael and Melissa Markovich, Parents of Ashlyn M. Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
Setnes ex rel. Setnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
O'Connell v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
Markovich v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
Goetz v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.