Legal Opinion

deFur v. deFur

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 4, 1995No. 13134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying one of the financial orders entered as part of the judgment that dissolved their marriage on March 27, 1992.

Whether the financial order in question was a modifiable order of child support or part of the nonmodifiable property settlement is at issue. Also at issue is the amount the trial court found as the arrearage in the defendant’s payment of this order. A third issue on appeal concerns the propriety of the trial court’s determination of the justification for the defendant’s reduction in income. We decline review of these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. J. M. Lynne Co. v. GeraghtySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Augeri v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. YoudinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Westfall v. WestfallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API