Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Westfall

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 12, 1997No. AC 15400PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*183 Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The plaintiff, Peggy J. Westfall, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion for contempt and modifying, sua sponte, the original judgment of dissolution. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied her motion for contempt and (2) modified the order requiring the defendant, Robert M. Westfall, to maintain a $100,000 insurance policy for the benefit of the plaintiff and the minor child when no such motion was pending before the court. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

The following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Costello v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berglass v. BerglassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Lowe v. LoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Shapero v. MercedeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API