Legal Opinion
Little v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 25, 2011No. Civil Case 10-21-KIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Plaintiff Melissa Little brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiffs applications for supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”) and child’s insurance benefits based on disability. I reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for a finding of disability.
DISABILITY ANALYSIS
The Social Security Act (the “Act”) provides for payment of disability insurance benefits to people who have contributed to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (SS) Purcella v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Balanda v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Carmen Claudia Salgado v. Andrew M. SaulDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Harris v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Margarito Martinez Vazquez v. Andrew SaulDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021