Legal Opinion
Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2005No. 19-50300PublishedCited by 3,338 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Jana Bayliss appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., 1381 et seq. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Bayliss retained the capacity to perform a wide range of light work, and thus that she was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The Appeals Council declined review, and the district court affirmed. We have…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,338 opinions
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Michelle Ford v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
3,333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.