Legal Opinion

(SS) Purcella v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01010Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SERINA TERESA PURCELLA, 10 Case No. 1:18-cv-01010-SKO Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL 12 SECURITY COMPLAINT ANDREW SAUL, 13 Commissioner of Social Security,1 14 Defendant. (Doc. 1) 15 _____________________________________/ 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On July 26, 2018, Plaintiff Serina Teresa Purcella (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 20 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 21 Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API