Legal Opinion
Lingenfelter v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2007No. 17-56610PublishedCited by 3,579 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge BEEZER.
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Allen Lingenfelter appeals the district court’s judgment affirming an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying his applications for social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“SSA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, 1381-83f. Lingenfelter argues that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s decision because the ALJ improperly rejected his testimony as not credible. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,579 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3,574 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.