Legal Opinion

Margarito Martinez Vazquez v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 14, 2021No. 2:20-cv-05675Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARGARITO MARTINEZ V.,1 ) NO. CV 20-5675-KS 11 Plaintiff, ) 12 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner 14 ) of Social Security, ) 15 Defendant. ) 16 _________________________________ ) 17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 20 Margarito Martinez V. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint on June 25, 2020, seeking review 21 of the denial of his application for a period of disability and disability insurance (“DI”). On 22 July 24, 2020, the parties consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to proceed before the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API