Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 2, 1995No. 1 CA-SA 95-0185PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

The State of Arizona petitions this court for special action relief from a superior court order disqualifying the entire Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (“MCAO”) from prosecuting the fifteen defendants involved in this action as real parties in interest. By previous order we accepted jurisdiction because petitioner has no plain, speedy, or adequate remedy by appeal and because the issue raised is of statewide importance and likely to recur. State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Court, 181 Ariz. 378, 380, 891 P.2d 246, 248 (App.1995); see also State ex rel. Collins v. Superior…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LatigueArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re OckrassaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gomez v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PINAL CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. KinkennonNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Amparano v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API