Legal Opinion

Naylor v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1932No. 28,784PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court granting a new trial exclusively for errors of law occurring at the trial.

The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries caused by plaintiff’s being struck by an automobile owned and driven by defendant. The issues presented were as to defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

The court granted a new trial on the ground of errors in its charge, which, according to its memorandum, the court found were prejudicial to plaintiff. Plaintiff Avas struck and injured by defendant’s automobile while she was walking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sassen v. HaegleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Mingo v. ExtrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Cressy v. Republic Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. State v. O'HaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Hartikka v. D. G. Cutler Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Zickrick v. StrathernSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API