Legal Opinion

Sassen v. Haegle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1914No. Nos. 18,460 — (58)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Action in the district court for Nobles county to recover $368.75. The case was tried before Nelson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The action is for damages for alleged violations of the covenants of a farm lease. The defendant prevailed and plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial.

The brief facts are these: For over 25 years defendant had been a tenant of his father upon the farm in question. While such tenant he placed on the farm a water tank, watering and feeding troughs, furnished storm windows and doo.rs for the dwelling house, installed a wagon scale on a stone foundation, affixed a hay carrier track to the barn, and fitted up a grain elevator in the granary, also placed therein a feed grinder; this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Wright v. MacDonnellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Second National Bank of Beloit, Wis. v. O. E. Merrill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ray v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API