Hartikka v. D. G. Cutler Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county by the administrator of tbe estate of Matti Karilainen, deceased, to recover $5,000 for tbe death of bis intestate. At tbe close of tbe testimony defendant moved for a directed verdict. Tbe court denied tbe motion. The case was tried before Cant, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Erom an order granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for personal injuries, in which defendant had a verdict and appealed from an order granting a new trial.
Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of dealing in salt, lime, cement, and building material at Duluth, this state. It owns and operates a large warehouse in which are stored articles kept for sale, and from which shipments are made. The warehouse is connected with the Northern Pacific Railway tracks by a spur running therefrom to the warelmuse, over which cars are moved to the warehouse to be loaded and unloaded. The warehouse is on lower ground than the railroad…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Olson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Barrett v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lohman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Cody v. LongyearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Demueles v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mingo v. ExtrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Naylor v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Grimes v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hector v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922