Legal Opinion

Mingo v. Extrand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1930No. 27,855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

The suit is one to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused by negligence of the defendant in operating his automobile. There was a verdict for defendant. On motion of the plaintiff the court granted a new trial on the ground of errors in its instructions to the jury, and defendant appeals.

Aside from the question of damages, the issues submitted to the jury were the usual issues of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence. In a portion of its charge the court said:

“Neither the defendant nor the plaintiff were bound to anticipate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Southern Minnesota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. O'Malley v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Hall v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Stallman v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Klaman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Naylor v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Larson v. SventekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API