Legal Opinion

Wayne National Bank v. National Bank of LaGrange

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant makes the point that it has an equitable claim to the insurance fund, to the extent of the indebtedness due it, by reason of the provision in its mortgage that the mortgagor would insure the buildings for its benefit; and to support this position the defendant cites Wheeler v. Factors’ and Traders’ Insurance Co., 101 U. S. (11 Otto), 439, 25 L. Ed., 1055.

We understand tbe principle to be that as a rule a mortgagee has no right to tbe benefit of a policy taken by tbe mortgagor, in tbe absence of an agreement to this effect, unless tbe policy is assigned to him; but where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Batts v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Stuyvesant Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Welch v. Sun Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Nelson Neal Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Mahler v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Employers' Fire Insurance v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API