Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover for loss by fire under a policy of insurance issued by the defendant.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the Federal Land Bank of Columbia, the defendant appeals, assigning errors. Defendant relies chiefly upon its demurrer to the evidence and motion for dismissal or for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at the close of plaintiffs' evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The exception noted at the close of all the evidence is the only one which may be considered on appeal, the first having been waived by the defendant.Harper v. Supply Co., 184 N.C.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Biggs v. Insurance Co. (North Carolina Home)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Modlin v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Roberts v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API