Legal Opinion
Clayton v. Farish
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.
These stockholders’ derivative actions, consolidated by order of Mr. Justice Schreiber (Clayton v. Standard Oil Company, 37 N. Y. S. 2d 259), are brought on behalf of Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, who will hereinafter be collectively designated as “ Standard ”. Defendants are Standard, the individuals who were its directors when the acts complained of occurred, and I. Gf. Farbenindustrie Aktiengesellschaft (hereinafter called “I. Gr.”), a German corporation. Judgment is demanded for $100,000,000 and directing the individual defendants and I.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gomberg v. Midvale CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Platt Corp. v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.