Legal Opinion
Gomberg v. Midvale Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1955No. Civ. A. 20012, 20019PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
The issues now before us arise out of two separate civil actions which, although based upon different grounds, have as their common purpose the single objective of obtaining an injunction preventing the consummation of a “Purchase Agreement” entered into between The Midvale Company and the Midvale-Ileppenstall Company on December 2, 1055.
Under the agreement Midvale agreed to sell, subject to the approval of a majority vote of the Midvale stockholders, all of its physical and operating assets to Midvale-Heppenstall for approximately $6,100,000 in cash. Settlement is to be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ash v. International Business Machines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Fein v. Security Banknote CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Ash v. International Business MacHines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Hutchinson v. American Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.