Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant Hubbard, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 6,. 1912, which modified) and affirmed as modified, the interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court sustaining the demurrers of the plaintiff as to certain separate defenses, and overruling them as to other separate defenses contained in the separate answers of the defendants, except that of the…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant Hubbard, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 6,. 1912, which modified) and affirmed as modified, the interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court sustaining the demurrers of the plaintiff as to certain separate defenses, and overruling them as to other separate defenses contained in the separate answers of the defendants, except that of the defendant Hubbard, as to all of which they were sustained. The substance of the pleadings, so far as material, and the questions…
1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.
The action is in behalf of the plaintiff and all other stockholders of the defendant company similarly situated against the company and five of its directors. Each defendant separately answered' the complaint and each answer contained six or more separate defenses. The plaintiff demurred to each separate defense. The Special Term sustained the demurrers as to certain and overruled them as to other separate defenses contained in the answer of the defendants except it sustained them as to all the separate defenses contained in the answer of defendant Hubbard. The Appellate Division, upon the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hanson Trust PLC v. ML SCM Acquisition Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kavanaugh v. . Kavanaugh Knitting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.