Legal Opinion

Cogin v. Ide

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1936No. 30,746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial after verdict for defendant and from the judgment in favor of defendant thereupon entered.

The assignments of error present three questions: First, it is assigned that the verdict is not justified by the evidence; second, that the court erred in submitting to the jury the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence; and, third, it is claimed that it was the duty of the court, in the interest of justice, to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, and that the court abused its discretion in not so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Plante v. PulaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Reddy v. Rex Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalscheuer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Doody v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Little v. ScheuAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Repplinger v. HajekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Johnson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API