Cogin v. Ide
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. Olsen, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial after verdict for defendant and from the judgment in favor of defendant thereupon entered.
The assignments of error present three questions: First, it is assigned that the verdict is not justified by the evidence; second, that the court erred in submitting to the jury the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence; and, third, it is claimed that it was the duty of the court, in the interest of justice, to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, and that the court abused its discretion in not so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Plante v. PulaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Reddy v. Rex Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kalscheuer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Doody v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Little v. ScheuAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Repplinger v. HajekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Johnson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938