Legal Opinion

Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1931No. 28,531PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

In an action to recover for personal.injuries by a passenger on defendant’s street railway, the defendant had a verdict, and the plaintiff appealed from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The case was here on a previous appeal. 180 Minn. 344, 230 N. W. 787.

Plaintiff was a woman about 03 years old at the time of the accident. In the evening of February 13, 1926, she and her daughter became passengers upon defendant’s northbound Cedar and Emerson street car in Minneapolis. Their destination was the intersection of Franklin and Park avenues, and when they approached that point the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Bakkensen v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stolte v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Harris v. EggermontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Rappaport v. Boyer & Gilfillan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Cogin v. IdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API