Legal Opinion

Doody v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1936No. 31,083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

The appeal is from an order denying the combined motion of plaintiffs for a new trial after verdicts for defendants. Alice Doody is the wife of Stephen Doody. Each sued defendant for damages, Alice for injuries received in a fall when carried as a passenger by defendant on its streetcar in St. Paul; and Stephen for consequential damages sustained by him on account of his wife’s injuries. Counsel for appellants frankly concede that the question of defendant’s negligence was for the jury, and that the verdicts cannot be disturbed unless the errors assigned upon court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Samonthia v. AhasaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Engholm v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Hoffman v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Cogin v. IdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API