Legal Opinion

Repplinger v. Hajek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1941No. 32,594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Appellant now contends that Cogin v. Ide, 196 Minn. 493,265 N.W. 315, is controlling in her favor. The difficulty with that contention is that, as pointed out in our opinion, in the case at bar there was sufficient evidence of contributory negligence to go to the jury. Consequently the verdict must stand.

Rehearing denied.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cogin v. IdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Repplinger v. HajekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941