Legal Opinion

Plante v. Pulaski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1932No. 28,919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The action is for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff, while on a cross-walk in the city of Duluth, was struck by an automobile driven by defendant at about 9:30 p. m. May 29, 1931. Plaintiff’s arm was so fractured that it has become wholly useless. The attorneys for. defendant frankly concede that the evidence made defendant’s negligence a jury issue. They challenge no ruling in the trial save the one refusing to direct a verdict for defendant. They do not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Richardson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rolfs v. MullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Filson v. BalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garey v. MichelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Reier v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Webster v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Cogin v. IdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Johnson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API