Plante v. Pulaski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action is for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff, while on a cross-walk in the city of Duluth, was struck by an automobile driven by defendant at about 9:30 p. m. May 29, 1931. Plaintiff’s arm was so fractured that it has become wholly useless. The attorneys for. defendant frankly concede that the evidence made defendant’s negligence a jury issue. They challenge no ruling in the trial save the one refusing to direct a verdict for defendant. They do not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Richardson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Rolfs v. MullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Filson v. BalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garey v. MichelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Reier v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Webster v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Cogin v. IdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Johnson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938