McGarrah v. McGarrah
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. Corbin, Justice.
Natalie Ann McGarrah appeals a divorce decree from the Crawford County Chancery Court. We affirm the chancellor’s decision pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(2) due to appellant’s failure to sufficiently abstract the proceedings below.
The standard of review of chancery court proceedings is whether the chancellor’s findings were clearly erroneous or clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. Riddick v. Streett, 313 Ark. 706, 858 S.W.2d 62 (1993). This we cannot determine with the abstract we have been provided. We have frequendy held that the record on appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- McAdams v. Automotive Rentals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- Argo v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. TroxelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Townsend v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Horton v. FerrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.