Legal Opinion

Riddick v. Streett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 1993No. 92-211PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James B. Sharp, Special Chief Justice.

The record in this case consists of more than 3,000 pages, over 200 exhibits, and over 100 findings of fact by the Chancellor. The new rules of this Court did not go into effect until May 1,1993. Rule 9(b) in effect at the time that the Appellants’ Brief was filed herein in part stated, “. . . the Appellants’ Abstract and Brief shall begin with a concise statement of the case, without argument. This statement, ordinarily not exceeding two pages in length, should be sufficient to enable the court to read the Abstract with an understanding of the nature of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Keith v. Barrow-Hicks Extensions of Water Improvement District No. 85Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Brown v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Harris v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Berry v. Saline Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API