Legal Opinion

Horton v. Ferrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1998No. 97-1210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

In this appeal dealing with the appropriate role of a special master appointed in a civil case, appellant contends that a special master is a judge subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct, and that when the special master declined to disqualify himself after relying upon ex parte communications, the trial court committed reversible error when it did not discharge the master and strike his report. We agree and remand for further proceedings.

The case developed as an accounting action following the dissolution of a partnership for growing tomatoes conducted by the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Farley v. JesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. KizerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Pierce v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  5. McGraw Edison Company v. Central Transformer Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ahmad v. Horizon Pain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Ahmad v. Horizon Pain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API