Legal Opinion

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. Troxel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1996No. 96-588PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

931 S.W.2d 784 (1996)

326 Ark. 524

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellant,

v.

Samuel A. TROXEL, Appellee,

No. 96-588.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

November 4, 1996.

G. Keith Griffith, Van Buren, for appellant.

Ernie Witt, Ozark, for appellee.

ROAF, Justice.

The appellant, Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE), petitioned the Franklin County Chancery Court to register a foreign divorce decree pursuant to the Revised Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA). OCSE sought to pursue child-support arrearages against the appellee, Samuel Troxel, based on the support ordered in the divorce…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Britton v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. McGarrah v. McGarrahSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Tanbal v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Board of Workforce Education v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. HollandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Office of Child Support Enforcement v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Office of Child Support Enforcement v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Office of Child Support Enforcement v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API