Legal Opinion

Dolphin v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1997No. 96-631Published

1Opinion of the Court

942 S.W.2d 815 (1997)

328 Ark. 1

Beatrice D. DOLPHIN, Appellant,

v.

Henrietta J. WILSON and Jimmie L. Wilson, Appellees.

No. 96-631.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 7, 1997.

David Solomon, Helena, for Appellant.

E. Dion Wilson, Helena, for Appellees.

ARNOLD, Chief Justice.

The case concerns an alleged oral contract for the sale of land. The appellees, Jimmie L. Wilson and Henrietta J. Wilson, filed suit for specific performance against appellant Beatrice D. Dolphin. The chancellor ruled in favor of the Wilsons, and Mrs. Dolphin appeals, raising two issues. The first question presented is whether the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Vickie Singer v. Robert Wadman, Vickie Singer v. Walter D. TalbotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API