Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ekstromer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1925No. Docket No. 1177PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating section 112 of the California Vehicle Act (Stats. 1923, p. 553), in driving and operating an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was sentenced to ninety days in the county jail, and he now appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Section 112 of the Vehicle Act reads as follows: “Persons under influence of liquor or drugs. No person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or who is an habitual user of narcotic drugs shall drive a vehicle on any public highway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. People v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. State v. HatcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. HaeusslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Luellen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API