Legal Opinion
People v. Dingle
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1922No. Crim. No. 843PublishedCited by 43 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Defendant was charged with a violation of that provision of section 17 of the Motor Vehicle Act whereby it is declared that “No person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . shall operate or drive a motor . . . vehicle on any public highway within this state.” (Stats. 1919, p. 214.) He was tried before a jury, was found guilty as charged, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for the term of six months. On this appeal from the judgment he contends that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction in that it fails to show that he was intoxicated, that"…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TerramorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Bakalars v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. HaeusslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.