Legal Opinion

Luellen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1938No. A-9377PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged by information in Garfield county with the driving of an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $200, and serve six months in the penitentiary, and has appealed.

The information in this case charged the defendant, Albert Luellen, did “unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly, and feloniously drive and operate a certain motor vehicle * * * over and upon a public highway * * * while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.” From the above it will be noted that the only charge made against the defendant was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. People v. EkstromerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Application of BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API