Legal Opinion

Gillan v. Stansbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1950No. Civ. 17148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

This case is before us on an appeal by Benjamin M. Stansbury and Hugh Gordon, defendants, from a judgment declaring plaintiff, Silas L. Gillan, to be the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest “in and to any renewal lease from the United States Government by reason of prospecting permit No. Los Angeles 033569, or any rights arising therefrom and/or lease and/or prospecting permit covering the following described land to wit: Northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 11 North, Eange 20 West, S. B. M. in Kern Comity, California, ’ ’ a like interest in certain personal property, and awarding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Schiffman v. Richfield Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fleming v. CasadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Recovery Oil Co. v. Van AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Fuller v. Laws EasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kincaid v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Air Purification, Inc. v. CarleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API