Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Miller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1954No. 17250PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

In the trial court plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in error was plaintiff. We will refer to the parties as they there appeared, or by name. Pearl Kincaid, also known as Pearl E. Kincaid, is the wife of defendant W. L. Kincaid. The trial court having determined that certain assignments of royalty interests made by W. L. Kincaid were solely for his convenience, and made without consideration, and it appearing that W. L. Kincaid was the only party actively participating in the transaction herein considered, we will refer to him as Kincaid. Plaintiff is a geologist and defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Goss v. LaninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Wyoming-Indiana Oil & Gas Co. v. WestonWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hooper v. YoderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Batterman v. Wells Fargo Ag Credit Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Yoder v. HooperColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Beebe v. Schwenn (In Re Schwenn)District Court, D. Colorado · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API