Legal Opinion

Schiffman v. Richfield Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1937No. L. A. 14977PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiff A. P. Schiffman brought this action for an accounting against defendant Richfield Oil Company of California, a corporation, which is the appellant herein. Plaintiff contends that by virtue of participating oil agreements which were issued to him by the Monrovia Oil Company he is entitled to share in the proceeds of oil produced from a certain well by defendant Richfield Company. Said company by mesne assignments has sue ceeded to the interest of the Monrovia Oil Company as sub-lessee of the premises from which the oil is being produced. It contends that the participating oil…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API