Legal Opinion

Kerby v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1905No. 14,097PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C.’J.;

Justin H. Kerby was formerly county clerk of Clay county. In addition to a fixed annual salary of $1200, and an annual allowance of $400 for clerk hire, the board of county commissioners awarded and paid him compensation for official services, including the preparation of abstracts and certificates of election, the making of assessment rolls, the drawing of juries, the burning of old ballots, and also for additional clerk hire. To recover back these extra allowances, amounting to $567.80, the county attorney brought an action in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Looscan v. County of HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Waters v. GarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Ventura County v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Roe v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Griffith v. BradburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Kingfisher County v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Clark v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API