State ex rel. Griffith v. Bradbury
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The state asks this court to compel the defendants, who constitute the board of trustees of the Labette county community high-school district, to bring an action in their official capacity .against themselves individually to recover a considerable amount of the public funds of the district which defendants unlawfully expended in the purchase and operation of three motor busses *496to carry the pupils of the district to and from school. This action is more or less sequential to State, ex rel., v. Cruzan, 120 Kan. 316, 243 Pac. 329, where this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russell v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Farney v. HauserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Benz v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- State ex rel. Weber v. YounkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 42 v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Kansas Power Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Peyton v. Chase County National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.