Dolezal v. Bostick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Charles R. Bostick, County Attorney of Noble County, against Joseph E. Dolezal, County Clerk of said county, and Henry Ereygang and A. A. Trocon, a copartnership doing business in the name of the Midland Bridge Company, for injunction. Temporary injunction made permanent, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
On August 17, 1906, after due advertisement and upon the lowest of nine bids received, the board of county commissioners of Noble county entered into a valid and binding contract in conformity with the provisions of section 4, art. 1, c. 29, Sess. Laws 1903, the same being section 7861, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 7441), with the Midland Bridge Company, one of the defendants, whereby this defendant undertook to construct three bridges…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- American R. Co. of PR v. BirchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Robert G. Lassiter & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Gordon v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.