Legal Opinion
State v. Modern Box Makers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1944No. 38,680PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
In a complaint filed in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, defendant was charged with violation of the zoning ordinance. It was convicted and appeals from the judgment.
The complaint, in effect, charges that defendant maintained a building and engaged in a commercial business in an area zoned as residential. The area involved was originally a part of the village of Kichfield, which was annexed to the city of Minneapolis in 1927. In 1929, the city council adopted an ordinance zoning the district which was formerly the village.
In 1907, John W. Sharpe, a wholesale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- City of Duluth v. KruppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- County of Freeborn v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Pearce v. Village of EdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.