Graffty v. City of Rushville
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitciiell, J.
Subdivision 23 of section 3106, R. S. 1881, empowers cities incorporated under the general law of the State of Indiana, “To regulate the ringing of bells and crying of goods, and to restrain hawking and peddling.” Assuming to act under the authority thus conferred, the common council of the city of Rushville, on the 10th day of September, 1883, passed an ordinance of the tenor following: “ That every person who peddles, hawks, sells, or exhibits for sale, any goods, wares or merchandise, not the growth or manufacture of Rush county, Indiana, or shall take orders for any such goods, wares or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Woodruff v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Walling v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Indiana Gaming Commission v. MoseleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Levy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Bills v. City of GoshenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Town of Green River v. BungerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.