Hardwick v. Ickler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, Orr, J., denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Defendant carried on the business of loan agent, acted as the agent of plaintiff in loaning his money, and, as such agent, made one loan for plaintiff of $400 on real-estate security, without demanding or obtaining an abstract of the title of the real estate, or having the title examined, or even inquiring whether or not there was any prior incumbrance on the property. He was entrusted by plaintiff with the whole matter of making the loan. It was subsequently discovered that there was a prior mortgage of *26one thousand dollars on the property. This mortgage was after-wards foreclosed, the time…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Trebby v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bell v. DangerfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Gilbert v. HewetsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Albers v. FitschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. TupaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Schmitt v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.