Legal Opinion

Sexton v. PNC Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 2002PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal, we address whether charges imposed by defendant PNC Bank (PNC) for cashing checks drawn on PNC violate the bank’s duty under 13 Pa.C.S. §§ 3409 and 3413, to pay drafts according to their terms at the time they are accepted. We conclude that such charges do not violate the bank’s duty under these sections. We consider also whether the bank’s practice in charging such fees, as alleged in the plaintiffs complaint, violates provisions of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. See 73 Pa.C.S. §§ 201-1 — 201-9.3. Again, we conclude that it does not.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Sun Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Grose v. Procter & Gamble Paper ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Heindel v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API