Legal Opinion
Webster Bank v. Zak
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 13, 2002No. AC 20906PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
This appeal in a foreclosure action returns to this court on remand from our Supreme Court. Webster Bank v. Zak, 259 Conn. 766, 792 A.2d 66 (2002).1 The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC (MFR), appeals from the trial court’s judgment of foreclosure, claiming that the court improperly concluded that a prior judgment conclusively established the principal amount of debt owed by MFR to the substitute plaintiff, EMC Mortgage Corporation (EMC). The central issue in this appeal is whether it was improper for the court to determine that EMC’s amended complaint did not vacate the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kevin Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haggerty v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Danzig v. PDPA, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Shapero v. MercedeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Moasser v. BeckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.