Legal Opinion

Sovereign Bank v. Harrison

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 28, 2018No. AC38937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBear, J.

In this foreclosure action, the plaintiff, Sovereign Bank, 1 appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Angela Harrison, 2 to restore her third special defense to the docket following the plaintiff's voluntary withdrawal of its action. 3 The plaintiff's principal claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in interpreting the defendant's special defense as a counterclaim and, therefore, lacked the authority to restore it to the docket. 4 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Pane v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Boothe v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. BuhlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Berglass v. DworkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. SpeerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Federal National Mortgage Assn. v. BuhlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API