Sovereign Bank v. Harrison
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBear, J.
In this foreclosure action, the plaintiff, Sovereign Bank, 1 appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Angela Harrison, 2 to restore her third special defense to the docket following the plaintiff's voluntary withdrawal of its action. 3 The plaintiff's principal claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in interpreting the defendant's special defense as a counterclaim and, therefore, lacked the authority to restore it to the docket. 4 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Pane v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Boothe v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. BuhlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Berglass v. DworkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. SpeerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Federal National Mortgage Assn. v. BuhlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018