Legal Opinion

Burt v. City of Idaho Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1983No. 13806PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

This controversy involves the annexation of approximately 68.78 acres of land by the city of Idaho Falls. The annexation was requested by several owners of the land. The City Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council conducted hearings and other required procedures preliminary to annexation, zoning and amendment of its Comprehensive Plan. The annexed land was then zoned C-l (commercial) by the city. The land had been previously zoned by the county as R-l (single-family residential).

The appellant, John I. Burt, claims to be a resident of Idaho Falls whose…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Golden v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State v. HuskeyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Homer v. Kootenai County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McCuskey v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API